The rule has had a long history filled with ups, downs and mixed support. Those opposed to the rule—often those in the financial services industry—say the rule will hurt the ability of individuals to receive financial advice, and will add compliance complexity and costs for their firms. The final rule was released in April 2016, with an effective date of June 7, 2016 and an applicability date of April 10, 2017. However, DOL delayed the applicability date more than once and eventually put enforcement efforts on hold due to conflicting court decisions. The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also proposed rules on this issue.   

Updates

• On May 2, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the motions of AARP and three state attorneys general to intervene in U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. DOL, derailing hopes that the full Fifth Circuit panel of judges would review its earlier panel decision striking down the fiduciary rule. 
• On the same day, AARP and the state attorneys general of New York, Oregon and California asked the court for permission to rehear the case in front of the full panel of 17 judges. The original ruling was made by three judges and resulted in a 2-1 split. 
  
• On April 18, 2018, SEC voted to propose rules and interpretations to enhance the quality and transparency of investors’ relationships with investment advisers and broker-dealers while preserving access to a variety of types of advice relationships and investment products.
  
• On March 19, 2018, DOL announced it will not enforce the fiduciary rule “pending further review.”   
• On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled to vacate the DOL's fiduciary rule and related applicable exemptions. This decision differs with the decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
  
• On November 29, 2017, DOL officially delayed the full implementation of the Best Interest Contract Exemption and other provisions of the rule and extended the transition period for review to July 1, 2019.
• On October 27, 2017, the Treasury Department released a report saying they support the DOL reexamination of the fiduciary rule​​ and outlining the potential harm caused by the rule.​​​
• On August 31, 2017, DOL proposed a delay in the full implementation of the ​Best Interest ​Contract Exemption as well as other provisions of the rule.​ These provisions were being reviewed during a transition period scheduled to end on January 1, 2018. This proposal would extend the transition period to July 1, 2019.​​ The DOL also released Field Assistance Bulletin ​2017-03 providing information on enforcement during the transition period.
• On August 4, 2017, EBSA released FAQs on​​ a fiduciary status issue and whether​ recommendations to contribute to a plan or to change plan design to increase participant contributions constitute​ investment advice. ​​
• ​On June 30​, 2017, EBSA​ released a request for information​, ​seeking pu​blic input on possible changes to the rule and possible additional exemptions.   ​​
• On June 9, 2017, ​​parts of the fiduciary rule are ​​implemented. 
• On June 1, 2017, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) chair issued a public statement​ opening a comment period to find out how the rule will impact retail investors and others.  ​
• On May 22, 2017 the new Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta announced​ there​ is no legal basis to further delay the rule and it will become applicable on June 9, 2017. ​​​
• Also on May 22, 2017, EBSA announced in Field Assistance Bulletin 2017-02​  that during the phased implementation period ending on January 1, 2018, the DOL will not pursue claims against fiduciaries who are working diligently and in good faith to comply with the fiduciary duty rule and exemptions.​ In addition, EBSA ​released FAQs related to the transition period for the rule.
• ​On April 4, 2017, the DOL EBSA issued a final rule​ delaying the fiduciary rule. 
• On February 3, 2017, President Trump issued a memo​ directing the DOL EBSA to examine the rule to determine whether it may adversely affect an individual's ability to gain access to retirement information and financial advice.​​ 
  

Background/Explanation of (Original) Final Rule

• DOL's Final Conflict of Interest Rule—Implications for Qualified Retirement Plan (Magazine article)
  
• DOL's Final Conflict of Interest Rule:  Impacts on Retirement Plan Education and Communications (Magazine article)
  
• Update on the DOL Conflict of Interest Rule (Webcast)
• Ten DOL Fiduciary Rule Questions Answered (Blog Post)
• Four Ways the Final Fiduciary Rule Affects Retirement Plans (Blog Post) 
  
• DOL EBSA (includes original final rule, final rule with new applicability date and other updates) 
  

Legal Challenges

• DOL Fiduciary Rule: Challenges to the Rule
  

State Actions 

• Maryland Takes a Step Back on Fiduciary Rule [ASPPA Net]
  
• Maryland Jumps Into Fiduciary Fray With Legislation Requiring Brokers to Act in Best Interest of Clients [Investment News]
  
• New Jersey Legislation Would Require Non-Fiduciary Disclosures [NAPA Net]
  
• New York Department of Financial Services Proposes Fiduciary Regulation [Drinker Biddle]
  
• Fiduciary Rules May Go Away, But States Are Stepping In [Bloomberg BNA]
• Nevada Imposes Fiduciary Obligations on Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers [Morgan Lewis]